[COMMENT TO WEBMASTER: This page must remain in this blog but needs revision. It should remain AS IS in sciencereligionunified blog. BBB]
The Bible says:
And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. (Gen 1:5)
Science says:
The particles flung out from the Big Bang grew cold and dark. Gravity attracted the closer particles and local groups moved together, merged and grew in size and gravitational attraction. As clouds of hydrogen gas grew larger, the internal gravitational forces squeezed them together, increasing the pressure and temperature of the gas to form dark, spinning proto-stars. Some of those proto-stars were also gathering other clumps of the cold, dark matter in their neighborhood and instead of merging with the proto-stars, some of the spinning, cold, dark clumps began to form dark planets that orbited around the cold, dark proto-stars.
The gravitation of the proto-stars pulled in more and more clouds of hydrogen gas and grew ever larger, and eventually, their pressures and temperatures rose to a critical point at which the hydrogen atoms in their centers began to fuse to form helium atoms. This action released vast amounts of energy from thermonuclear fusion. Going critical, the one proto-star that would become our sun, suddenly began to give off great amounts of energy in the form of radiant heat and light and the now-roaring inferno of that proto-star became our blazing sun. The sudden presence of light bathed the orbiting planets with the sides of the planets facing the new sun being bombarded with great illumination while the side facing away from the sun remained darkened. As each of the planets rotated about its own axis, one side faced the sun and was always lighted while the other side always remained dark.
Again, where is the conflict between these two accounts?
Do you want to Continue seeing the comparisons between the Bible and scientific accounts of the Creation, or are you satisfied that there is no significant conflict between them?